Spinosaurus VS T-Rex

Rexyman wrote:Spino would probably win if they fought.

Rexyman wrote:Spino would probably win if they fought.

godzillaman wrote:
You're kidding, right? Rexy had the strongest jaws of any animal ever, past or present.

yeah.rexxy would probably win. but according to studies. spino was one of the biggest carnivores ever uncovered. might have been even bigger than ol' rexxy. Very Happy

super spino on islanublar.darkbb.com wrote:Actually, that is not true. Let's lay down some facts here before everybody uses JP/// as a scientific refference. First of all Spino was not the whale sized monster that it was in JP///. In fact, it probably wasn't even a hunter at all. It was more like a fisher. Evidence suggests that since spino's teeth were designed like baryonx and suchominus, both of which are fish eaters, it is more likely than not that spino was in fact a fish eater. And if spino did want to hunt something, it would have to be small. Anything bigger than and Oranosaurus would be way to big to kill. So if it would eat meat it would probably scavenge something dead.

As for t-rex it is a proven hunter. Scars on trike's frills and Edmontosaurus' skeletons suggest that these dinos were victims of t-rex but escaped, therefore proving it was a hunter. As a hunter and being much bigger in size , as well as, having specialized crushing teeth t-rex would have no problem killing a spino if they ever lived together.

Allosaurus571 on islanublar.darkbb.com wrote:Did you hear super spino. I agree with him 100% Spino WAS NOT built to fight. Rex would win hands down. Spino also had the weak spine. you can't grow back bone if its broken off in a fight. Spino would have no chance unless the rex was dead or dying.

Allosaurus571 on islanublar.darkbb.com wrote:Long Snout=Fishing and would not be as strong as a more compact jaw

Size doesn't matter all that much here, only about 5 foot difference.

Rex had one of the most powerful bite power per square inch EVER

The spine on the Spino was WEAK! And, you can't grow back bones, witch the spine is made out of.

The arms may have been bigger but there is not much you can do with them when your neck is being crush or your on the ground with rexy on top of you.

You guys have to get your facts straight. Rex will win. And, don't trust JPIII, its wrong

thegrimmshow wrote:but still, there are what if's. and what if they did live in the same place and time? right

Allosaurus571 wrote:

super spino on islanublar.darkbb.com wrote:Actually, that is not true. Let's lay down some facts here before everybody uses JP/// as a scientific refference. First of all Spino was not the whale sized monster that it was in JP///. In fact, it probably wasn't even a hunter at all. It was more like a fisher. Evidence suggests that since spino's teeth were designed like baryonx and suchominus, both of which are fish eaters, it is more likely than not that spino was in fact a fish eater. And if spino did want to hunt something, it would have to be small. Anything bigger than and Oranosaurus would be way to big to kill. So if it would eat meat it would probably scavenge something dead.

As for t-rex it is a proven hunter. Scars on trike's frills and Edmontosaurus' skeletons suggest that these dinos were victims of t-rex but escaped, therefore proving it was a hunter. As a hunter and being much bigger in size , as well as, having specialized crushing teeth t-rex would have no problem killing a spino if they ever lived together.

Allosaurus571 on islanublar.darkbb.com wrote:Did you hear super spino. I agree with him 100% Spino WAS NOT built to fight. Rex would win hands down. Spino also had the weak spine. you can't grow back bone if its broken off in a fight. Spino would have no chance unless the rex was dead or dying.

Allosaurus571 on islanublar.darkbb.com wrote:Long Snout=Fishing and would not be as strong as a more compact jaw

Size doesn't matter all that much here, only about 5 foot difference.

Rex had one of the most powerful bite power per square inch EVER

The spine on the Spino was WEAK! And, you can't grow back bones, witch the spine is made out of.

The arms may have been bigger but there is not much you can do with them when your neck is being crush or your on the ground with rexy on top of you.

You guys have to get your facts straight. Rex will win. And, don't trust JPIII, its wrong

REX WINS HANDS DOWN!

Universal genesis wrote:I think that spino wins.

Allosaurus571 wrote:1: Being fast and agile comes at what cost?

Allosaurus571 wrote:And I know my facts are accurate because I study dinosaurs.

Although gharials have sacrificed the great mechanical strength of the robust skull and jaw that most crocodiles and alligators have, and in consequence cannot prey on large creatures, the reduced weight and water resistance of their lighter skull and very narrow jaw gives gharials the ability to catch rapidly moving fish

T. rex's lower jaw could apply 200,000 newtons of force, or enough strength to lift a tractor-trailer.

Allosaurus571 wrote:1: Being fast and agile comes at what cost? Being very fragile, like the raptor. It's spine was also fragile.
2: The Rex had THE strongest bite force ever. The spino long jaws couldn't be very strong because the strength has to spread out all over the jaw evenly, where as the Rex's Jaw was compact and unimaginably strong.
3: Spino was not built for fighting, it was built for fishing, unlike the rex.

And I know my facts are accurate because I study dinosaurs.